On this page
- What are competency based interview questions?
- How competency interviews are scored
- 30 competency based interview questions
- How to answer using the STAR method
- Building a competency example bank
- Competency frameworks by sector
- Competency interviews vs other formats
- Common mistakes to avoid
- Competency interview FAQ
What are competency based interview questions?
Competency based interview questions — sometimes called behavioural questions — ask you to describe something you have actually done, rather than what you would do or what you are like. Instead of "are you a good communicator?", the panel asks "tell me about a time you had to explain something complex to someone without a technical background."
The reasoning is straightforward. Anyone can claim to be organised. Far fewer can describe a specific week when they were, what they did, and what happened as a result. Past behaviour is treated as the best available predictor of future behaviour, so the whole format is built around getting evidence rather than opinion.
This is now the dominant format across UK hiring: the NHS, the Civil Service, local government, most graduate schemes, and the majority of large private employers. The competencies change between sectors; the technique for answering does not.
You can usually recognise a competency question by its opening words:
- "Tell me about a time when…"
- "Describe a situation where…"
- "Give me an example of…"
- "Talk me through an occasion when…"
- "When have you had to…"
Anything phrased that way is asking for a story with a beginning, a middle and an outcome. Anything phrased as "how would you…" is a hypothetical and wants your reasoning instead.
How competency interviews are scored
Most candidates prepare their examples and never think about the marking. This is a mistake, because the scoring system explains why some good answers score badly.
In a structured competency interview, the panel agrees the competencies and the scoring criteria before anyone is interviewed. Every candidate gets broadly the same questions, and each answer is scored independently, usually on a scale like this:
- 0 — no evidence. The question was not answered, or the answer contained no example.
- 1 — poor. Vague, hypothetical, or entirely about what the team did.
- 2 — limited. A real example, but thin on the candidate's own actions or on the outcome.
- 3 — satisfactory. A relevant example with clear personal action and a result. Usually the appointable threshold.
- 4 — good. A strong example with detail, reflection, and evidence of judgement.
- 5 — excellent. A compelling example that also demonstrates impact beyond the immediate task.
Four consequences follow, and they matter more than any individual model answer.
Each question is scored separately. An outstanding answer to question two cannot compensate for a blank on question five. If you genuinely have no example, say so and offer the nearest thing you do have — a transferable example always scores higher than silence.
Detail is what separates a 2 from a 4. "I dealt with a difficult customer" earns almost nothing. "A customer had been waiting three weeks for a refund, had already been promised it twice, and arrived at the counter shouting" gives the marker something to award points for. Same story, different score.
"I" outscores "we" every time. The panel is scoring you, not your team. Set the scene with "we" if you must, then switch decisively: what did you personally decide, say and do? Answers delivered entirely in the first-person plural routinely score 2 where the underlying story deserved a 4.
Some competencies are weighted. A safeguarding question in a care role, or a data-handling question in a corporate one, may be worth double. You will rarely be told which, so treat every question as though it carries the most weight.
Many organisations publish their framework. The Civil Service publishes Success Profiles with behaviour indicators at each level; the NHS scores against the six Constitution values. If your employer publishes theirs, read it before the interview — it is effectively the mark scheme.
30 competency based interview questions
Grouped by the competency being tested, because that is how panels think about them. Prepare one solid example per group rather than thirty separate answers — a good story usually covers several competencies at once.
Teamwork and collaboration
- Tell me about a time you worked as part of a successful team. The panel wants your specific contribution, not a description of the team. Name what you personally did.
- Describe a time you had to work with someone difficult. Professionalism is the mark here. Focus on how you adapted, not on how unreasonable they were.
- Give an example of when you supported a struggling colleague. Noticing early scores well, as does knowing when to involve a manager.
- Tell me about a time you disagreed with your team's approach. They want someone who raises concerns properly, then commits to the decision.
Communication
- Describe a time you explained something complex to a non-specialist. Say what you actually changed about your explanation, and how you checked they had understood.
- Tell me about a time you had to deliver bad news. Directness with compassion. Avoiding it is the wrong answer.
- Give an example of when your communication prevented a problem. Strong question for showing initiative as well as communication.
- Describe a time you had to persuade someone. Evidence you listened first tends to score higher than evidence you argued well.
Problem solving and decision making
- Tell me about a complex problem you solved. Walk through your reasoning, not just the outcome. The method is what is being scored.
- Describe a decision you made with incomplete information. Very common at senior levels. Say what you did to reduce the uncertainty before deciding.
- Give an example of when you spotted a problem others had missed. Attention to detail plus initiative.
- Tell me about a time a solution of yours did not work. Honesty and what you did next. Claiming this has never happened scores badly.
Planning and organisation
- Describe how you prioritise when everything is urgent. Give an actual method, and evidence that you escalate rather than silently fail.
- Tell me about a time you managed competing deadlines. Specific about what you moved, dropped or delegated.
- Give an example of a project you planned from start to finish. Scope, milestones, what went wrong, what you adjusted.
- Describe a time your planning prevented something going wrong. The quiet competency nobody prepares for.
Resilience and adaptability
- Tell me about a significant setback and how you handled it. Honest about the difficulty, clear about the recovery.
- Describe a time you had to adapt to unexpected change. Your genuine first reaction, then what you did anyway.
- Give an example of working under sustained pressure. Include how you looked after your own capacity — panels are wary of burnout.
- Tell me about a time you received difficult feedback. What you changed as a result is the entire answer.
Leadership and influence
- Describe a time you led without formal authority. Increasingly common, and a strong differentiator at mid-level.
- Tell me about a time you motivated others. Specific to individuals, not a general philosophy of leadership.
- Give an example of when you delegated effectively. Why that person, what support you gave, how you followed up.
- Describe a difficult conversation you had to initiate. Preparation, privacy, and the outcome.
Customer and service focus
- Tell me about a time you went beyond what was expected for someone. Small and human beats heroic.
- Describe a complaint you handled. Listening before defending, and what changed afterwards.
- Give an example of improving a service or process. State the problem, the change, and the measurable result if you have one.
Integrity and judgement
- Tell me about a time you raised a concern. The proper channel, documented, escalated if not addressed.
- Describe a time you made a mistake. Reported promptly, mitigated, learned from. Concealment is the failing answer.
- Give an example of when you had to make an unpopular decision. The reasoning and how you communicated it.
How to answer using the STAR method
STAR gives a competency answer the shape markers are looking for:
- Situation — where and when, in two sentences. Enough for the rest to make sense.
- Task — what you were responsible for. This is where "we" becomes "I".
- Action — what you did, step by step. The longest section by far, because it carries the marks.
- Result — what happened, ideally with a number, plus what you learned.
Two errors account for most low scores. The first is spending ninety seconds on the situation and fifteen on the action — panels cannot award points for background. The second is stopping at the result: adding one sentence of reflection often lifts an answer a full point.
Aim for roughly two minutes per answer. Much shorter and there is not enough evidence; much longer and the panel starts steering you.
Full detail in our guide to the STAR method, with worked examples.
Building a competency example bank
The single most effective preparation is not memorising answers. It is assembling six to eight strong stories you can adapt on the spot.
Start from the job description. The person specification usually lists the competencies almost verbatim — they are the same words the panel will score against. Map at least one example to each.
Choose stories with range. A single incident where you led a project under pressure, handled a disagreement and delivered a result can serve teamwork, leadership, resilience and communication depending on which part you emphasise. Eight flexible stories will cover almost any competency interview.
Write them out in full once. Drafting forces you to find the specifics — dates, numbers, what was actually said — that you will otherwise fumble under pressure.
Then reduce each to a keyword. You are not reciting. A one-page list of story titles is enough to stop your mind going blank, and most panels allow notes.
Practise aloud, ideally with follow-ups. Competency panels probe: "what would you have done differently?", "how did the others react?", "what was the impact six months later?" Answers that collapse under a follow-up are usually the invented ones.
Competency frameworks by sector
The technique is universal; the competencies are not. Check which framework your employer uses before you prepare.
NHS. Scored against the six NHS Constitution values — working together for patients, respect and dignity, commitment to quality of care, compassion, improving lives, everyone counts. Expect safeguarding, prioritisation and difficult-colleague scenarios, with expectations rising sharply by band. See our guides to NHS interview questions and NHS competency questions.
Civil Service. Uses Success Profiles: Behaviours, Strengths, Ability, Experience and Technical. The nine behaviours have published indicators at each grade, which is effectively the mark scheme in public. See Civil Service interview questions, the behaviours in detail, and Success Profiles explained.
Graduate schemes. Commercial awareness, teamwork, drive and adaptability, usually with examples drawn from university, part-time work and societies rather than career history. See graduate scheme interview questions.
Education. Safeguarding sits at the centre, alongside behaviour management, inclusion and working with families. See our teaching assistant and primary teaching guides.
Private sector. Frameworks vary, but most large employers publish values on their careers site. Amazon's Leadership Principles are the clearest example of a published framework worth learning verbatim — see our guide to those.
Competency interviews vs other formats
Knowing which format you are in tells you how to answer, and many interviews mix two or three.
Competency (behavioural). "Tell me about a time…" — wants a real example, scored against a framework. This guide.
Strengths-based. "What do you enjoy most?", "what comes naturally to you?" — wants authentic energy rather than evidence, and interviewers are listening for how you light up. The Civil Service and several graduate schemes mix these into competency panels. Prepared-sounding answers score worse here, not better.
Situational. "How would you handle…" — hypothetical, wants your reasoning. Answer the scenario directly, then strengthen it with a brief real example if you have one.
Technical. Wants the answer. Be concise and correct; add an example of application only if it genuinely adds something.
Motivational. "Why this role, why us?" — wants research and genuine reasons. A STAR story here reads as evasion.
If you are unsure which you are being asked, listen for the tense. Past tense wants evidence. Conditional wants reasoning. Present tense usually wants self-knowledge.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Speaking entirely in "we". The most common and most costly error. The panel cannot score a team.
- Hypothetical answers to past-tense questions. "I would always make sure…" earns nothing when they asked what you did.
- Too much scene-setting. If you are still describing the department a minute in, you have spent your time on the unscored part.
- No result. An answer that stops after the action leaves the story unfinished and the marker unconvinced.
- The same example for everything. Using one story for six questions signals thin experience, even when it does not exist.
- Inventing examples. Follow-up questions expose these reliably, and recovering from that is very hard.
- Refusing to name a weakness or mistake. Reads as either dishonest or unreflective. Both score badly.
- Ignoring the published framework. When an employer tells you what they score, not reading it is an avoidable loss.
Key takeaways
- Competency questions want evidence from your past, not opinions about your character.
- Answers are scored individually, usually 0 to 5, with 3 the typical appointable threshold.
- Specific detail and first-person ownership are what move a score from 2 to 4.
- Prepare six to eight flexible STAR stories mapped to the person specification, not one answer per question.
- Check whether your employer publishes a framework — the NHS values and Civil Service Success Profiles are public.
- A sentence of reflection at the end of each answer is the cheapest available upgrade.
Competency interview FAQ
How are competency based interviews scored?
Most employers score each answer separately, typically from 0 to 5, against criteria agreed before interviewing begins. Around 3 is usually the appointable threshold. Because questions are scored independently, a blank answer cannot be recovered by a strong one elsewhere, and some organisations weight safety-critical or role-critical competencies more heavily.
How many competency questions will I be asked?
Typically six to eight in a 45 to 60 minute interview, with follow-up probes on each. More senior roles run longer and often add a presentation or a second panel.
What is the difference between competency and behavioural interview questions?
In UK usage they mean the same thing. "Competency-based" is the more common term in the public sector and among large employers; "behavioural" is more common in US-influenced and private-sector settings. Both ask for evidence of what you have actually done.
What if I have no example for a competency question?
Say so briefly, then offer the closest thing you have — from study, a placement, voluntary work or a different sector. A transferable example scores far better than silence, and considerably better than an invented one, which follow-up questions usually expose.
How long should a competency answer be?
Around two minutes. Shorter rarely contains enough evidence to score well; much longer and you risk being stopped mid-answer. Spend most of that time on what you did, not on setting the scene.
Can I use the same example for more than one question?
Once or twice, emphasising a different aspect each time, is fine and often unavoidable. Using one story for every question signals narrow experience. Prepare six to eight so you always have an alternative.
Should I use "I" or "we" in a competency answer?
Use "we" only to set the context, then switch to "I" for everything you personally did. Panels score individuals, so an answer told entirely in the plural leaves the marker with nothing to award points for — one of the most common reasons strong candidates score poorly.